(As with all my entries, this constitutes my thoughts alone and do not represent the views of Google)
In her bestseller: “The Mesh”, Lisa Gansky demonstrates the value of living in an interconnected world and how the new business models will rely on social networks. When I first read it in 2010, I never found it particularly insightful or innovative; yet pundits raved about Gansky’s thought leadership. My belief was, and still is, that social networks are technological manifestations of the “6 degrees of separation” theory, or how many degrees are you from Kevin Bacon. (Side note: with the advance in technology, it’s not longer 6, but down to 3. Malcolm Gladwell speaks about this in “The Tipping Point”).
Unimpressed with “The Mesh”, allow me to share some insights (or delusions) on social networks.
“Likes”, “+1;s”, “Re-tweets” – all infiltrating the web and becoming as commonplace as sinking financial institutions. Social networks (as mentioned in the Mesh) either solidify the physical relationships we have (Facebook) or help facilitate introductions between strangers (LinkedIn/Twitter). Google + combines both with Circles and streams. There is another reason that sets Google + and Linked apart from Twitter and Facebook – shared commonalities.
As in life, we form connections with folks with whom we share commonalities – Football, cooking class, alumni, even extremes like political reform. These “physical connections” typically need an introduction. In Social networks, this is eliminated.
The best social networks though retain shared interests. In my view, this is why Facebook (in its current form) is in danger. The many folks removing friends or deleting profiles, is because they don’t wish to share information overlapping interest group (friends vs. family vs. employees). Examine your physical relationship and evaluate how often you mix your various groups. Facebook is a behemoth because of first mover advantage, and the consequent critical mass (i.e. all your friends are on, so you wont move unless your friends move).
The next evolution of social will be a “Social Path”.
As an engineer, I’ll compare with physical properties (space and time) and contrast the evolutions Social is undergoing.
- Phase 1: X co-ordinate (single point in space): Creation of webpages, profiles, blogs give an online presence. Google’s success building the indices between these points though algorithms (Page Rank)
- Phase 2: X-Y plane (distance): Connection’s are formed between various “points in space” – trackbacks, pings, links. The early formation of Facebook/Linkedin. In addition to being found through Google, recommendations are through reviewing prior connections (email).
- Phase 3: Speed between X-Y (Web 2.0): Groups are formed with similar interests. LinkedIn and Google +’s circle’s.
- Phase 4: Velocity (magnitude and direction): The formation of “Social paths” where a system will “predict” connections between social groups based on a desired outcome that may or may not be known.
Phase 4, will be a combination of “6 degrees of separation” between social groups that simultaneously steer you toward completing an action. This will facilitate common interests and overlap of complementary actions. Imagine a system that places you with peers of common interests, then predicts the social interaction required to advance to a predetermined (yet possibly unperceived goal). This would be a system analogous to a chess master iterating several moves ahead. Such a user experience would “understand exactly what you mean and gives you back exactly what you want” (Larry Page).
Draw the comparison to a parent that notices their child displaying excellent hand/eye coordination. The parent enrolls the child in tennis club, but notes their child is also a team player, so exposes the child to soccer. Noticing that strong hand/eye co-ordination and strong social development may be a prelude to playing in an orchestra the parent again is proactive to their child’s needs. At every iteration, the parent perceives their child’s interests and skills and acts accordingly.
While I may be wide of the mark; one thing holds true: tomorrows companies will innovate ahead of what is seen today; they continue to create blue oceans and drag the market with them. I have no doubt that Social is here to stay, in what form, tomorrow will tell.
“How are you settling in?”
After a weeks vacation (and subsequent leave from writing here) I’m back in front of my repaired Mac, ready to share my thoughts on productivity versus potential.
During the last few months, I’ve explored the next step in my career. Now that I’ve accepted an offer to join Google South Africa, I wanted to share thoughts on the paradox of choice.
Thank you for the numerous birthday messages I received. So glad to have made it past the rapture and have now been on the this giant molten rock that has orbited around a flaming, gaseous super-body 31 times.
